William Nordhaus has criticized the hostility of Pope Francis to the market mechanism in his last encyclical, in an article in the New York Review of Books. This article explains to the Pope that markets are certainly not perfect, but they have more potential than that acknowledged by Francis. Markets and public intervention sometimes are complementary, as in cap and trade to fight climate change. A good aspect of the encyclical is that the Pope acknowledges the scientific reality of climate change. I had an interesting discussion of this article with my students at UAB's Master in Economics and Business Administration. One of them defended the attack of the Pope on consumerism, and said that he should accordingly recommend influencing the demand curve as a way to reduce negative externalities as well. A good point. Here's how Nordhaus' articles ends:
"Given the successes of cap-and-trade and other market mechanisms to
improve the environment, it is unfortunate that they are the target of
Pope Francis’s criticism. Permits for emissions are traded like other
financial assets, and indeed they are often highly volatile; but there
is no evidence that they are the favored instrument of financial
speculators. Rather, they are volatile because future economic
conditions (such as electricity demand or natural gas prices) are
uncertain.
Perhaps no one will attend to Pope Francis’s attack on
trade in permits and implicitly on carbon pricing. Perhaps his
endorsement of climate science and the reality of warming and
environmental damage will be effective in turning the tide toward strong
actions.
But he has missed a unique opportunity to endorse one of
the two crucial elements of an effective strategy for slowing climate
change. He does indeed acknowledge the soundness of the science and the
reality of global warming. It is unfortunate that he does not endorse a
market-based solution, particularly carbon pricing, as the only
practical policy tool we have to bend down the dangerous curves of
climate change and the damages they cause".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment